Monday, January 19, 2026

Happy New Year

With 2025 in the rear-view mirror and the 2025-2026 legislative work plan already established, the Gilroy City Council will dive right into items that need to be completed in 2026. Once the new City Council is seated after the November 3, 2026 election, a new legislative work plan will be established.

This year I will focus on continuing to move Gilroy into the 21st century, building upon the relationships I’ve made, legislative items in our work plan, and introducing new items. We will focus on Policy to Direct General Fund Annual Surplus to Capital Infrastructure Investment, Communication and Support for District-Based Elections, Tobacco Prevention, Opportunity Sites & Programs in our Housing Element 2023-2031, Transportation Demand Management Vehicle Miles Traveled Policy, Climate Action Plan, Joint Use Agreements, and State Legislative Bills.

Year-to-date my office has worked with our State and Federal legislators to secure $5.2 million for project funding that directly benefits our residents, from a bike/ped trail extension on the westside, San Ysidro Park on the eastside, and an enhanced crosswalk for senior housing on the southside. 

I am proud of the housing plan that the Gilroy City Council, Planning Commission, staff and the public approved in 2023. We commit to advancing the 40 opportunity sites for multi-family homes, downtown expansion district and First Street mixed-use corridor flexibility program, 429 corner lots for the middle-income housing program, housing for farmworkers program, and our inclusionary housing ordinance. Empowered through our local control, we will implement these programs and follow through with what we have promised to our residents. By doing this we will become eligible for funding toward implementing our programs and provide housing for all. We are now pulling in the same direction as the region’s long-range plan for housing, transportation, economy and the environment known as Plan Bay Area 2050. It calls for creating compact walkable communities by promoting high-density housing and mixed-use development near transit stations and in existing urban areas. 

We advocate for building and planning that considers future generations as well as current residents who don’t own cars. Advancing mobility options reflects what we are teaching the youth in our community through Safe Routes to School and why we are nationally recognized as a Bronze Bicycle Friendly Community from the League of American Bicyclists, as well as recognized by the World Health Organization as an Age-Friendly Community. The City of Gilroy is a Complete Streets and Recreation Destination community by resolution. 

My office sponsored, tabled, hosted a booth, and attended more than 100 community events in 2025. We provided free resources, bike lights, bike helmets, and listened to constituents at events including Pride Festival, Cinco de Mile, La Ofrenda Festival, Free Bike Repair and Bike Days, and School Family Resource Fairs. 

Each year the Mayor assigns Council Members to represent the City Council on regional and local committees. For 2026, I was nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by members of the City Council to serve in the expanded role as Vice Mayor. I will serve on the Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) Authority JPA Board, Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Policy Advisory Committee (PAC), South County Youth Task Force Policy Team, Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) General Assembly, CalTrain Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Alternate, and Santa Clara Expressway Plan 2040 Policy Advisory Board (PAB) (Alternate). Appointed to Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Alternate by the Cities Association of Santa Clara County.

All of these legislative changes will make Gilroy more Livable for All. The path forward is clear to me. It will require everyone’s voices to be heard during public comment and focused work from my student interns. I’ll be here to guide you through it. From my office and family, I wish you all a happy and healthy new year.


Sunday, January 4, 2026

Caltrain South County Connector (Part 3)

I’ve seen the November South County Connector ridership numbers (Monday-Friday 4 Trains North in morning and 4 Trains South in evening) Gilroy 133 riders/day, San Martin 34 riders/day, Morgan Hill 136 riders/day, Blossom Hill 76 riders/day, Capitol 49 riders/day. It's not fiscally responsible to fund Caltrain South County Connector at $15 million for 428 riders/day M-F when they aren’t serving the current commute travel patterns and while VTA is facing a fiscally constrained FY26 and FY27 Transit Operating Budget. Caltrain is heading into a deficit for FY27 too. These five stations south of Tamien are not electrified and Caltrain doesn’t own the tracks, Union Pacific Railroad does. South County Caltrain service doesn’t have the impact needed to relieve congestion on U.S. Route 101 today or historically. 


Although VTA Staff has stated they will not cut frequent/daily Gilroy VTA bus service in order to keep Caltrain service, I remain concerned that Caltrain Staff will still try and pursue this option. All while VTA is facing a fiscally constrained FY26 and FY27 Transit Operating Budget and Caltrain is heading into a deficit for FY27 too. The demographic of riders I am currently hearing from that use VTA vs South County Caltrain are contrasted between those whose incomes need frequent/daily public transportation on VTA for their jobs, groceries, healthcare, and aging in place, may be sacrificed for those with significantly more means that are attending private prep-schools and commuting an average of 3 days a week on Caltrain.


We continue to talk about this at our South County VTA agenda preparation meetings with VTA staff and Caltrain staff. Caltrain and VTA aren’t focused just on Gilroy and Morgan Hill. We are focused on moving the most people on mass transit from Gilroy to Diridon. We track and budget the ridership/cost from both agencies and have been comparing them for a long time. When ridership is low, services get cut, that’s a given. 


Seated capacity for each of the 4 diesel trains that make up the South County Connector as configured currently (3 cars, including 1 bike car) is 394-415, with space for 24 bikes. Each car has between 114 and 144 seated capacities and the standing room capacity ranges from 472-498. Total max seated capacity of the South County Connector service is 1,660. Standing room max capacity 1,992. Caltrain FY26 cost of South County Connector from a calculation in April is $14,451,619. More trains or increased frequency will increase that cost. That's not worth it for the current or future budget cycle. Caltrain operations should not be funded from VTA Transit funds, 2000 Measure A funds, or 2016 Measure B Caltrain Corridor Capacity. There are no grants that would be beneficial in funding this current level of service and ridership. Caltrain is currently using Federal funds to operate the South County Connector and that is about to run out. 


Gilroy isn’t the starting point for traffic any longer. San Benito County and Monterey County drivers contribute to it as well. In 2023 Caltrans Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) at Cochrane in Morgan Hill was 142,000 vehicles per day and in 2019 Caltrans Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) at Cochrane in Morgan Hill was 148,000 vehicles per day.


Per the 1996 Restated Joint Powers Agreement (JPA Sections A and B) make VTA “responsible for all net operating costs of the Gilroy service” and “obtaining all Gilroy Service capital projects”. It does not obligate Caltrain or VTA to operate service to Gilroy, though it assumed there would always be a market. 


The State provided funding for one battery powered train (not four) which will serve as a pilot and it is supposed to run on the electrified system from Diridon to SF. The last update I received is this is not going to happen in FY26 or FY27. 


VTA, Caltrain, and South County communities do minimal to increase Caltrain South County Connector ridership, so the expectation that ridership on Caltrain will increase is not a reality today. It's not fiscally responsible to fund $15 million for 428 riders/day M-F. 


I am proud to represent Gilroy on the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) and CalTrain Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Alternate in 2026.